However, I do not agree with the conclusion that section 20(1)(aA) of the ActĪgainst women and that it is thus inconsistent with theĬonstitution applies is governed by item 17 of Schedule 6 of the Constitution The right to privacy must fail differ in both their scope To conclude that the challenge based on the right to economic activity and Person, privacy and economic activity must fail. I agree with theĬhallenges based on human dignity, freedom of Reading the joint judgment of O’Regan and Sachs JJ. PIETER CROUS AND MENELAOS GEMELIARISğifth AmicusĪNDREW LIONEL PHILLIPS Sixth Amicus Curiae S v Jordan and Others (Sex Workers Education and Advocacy Task Force and Others as Amici Curiae (CCT31/01) Z(6) SA 642 2002 (11) BCLR 1117 (9 October 2002)ĪPPLIED LEGAL STUDIES Second Amicus CuriaeĬOMMISSION FOR GENDER EQUALITYğourth Amicus
